header

CEDEN Data Checker

CEDEN LookUp List: QALookUp

QACodeQANameLastUpdateDate
ANISample results for structural isomers may have contribution from their isomeric pair2022-03-18
AUDEToxicity test endpoint data of unknown quality2021-05-20
AUDWWater parameter data of unknown quality2021-05-20
AWMDetection limit increased due to dilution prior to final sample volume (not a secondary dilution)2014-11-19
AYMatrix interference suspected2014-06-09
BAnalyte found in reagent blank, indicates possible reagent or background contamination2020-10-13
BBSample > 4x spike concentration2010-03-17
BBMSample > 2X but less than 4X spike concentration2010-03-17
BCIThe reporting limit is elevated due to a chromatographic interference2020-01-30
BCOSample received in improper container2022-02-14
BDL0 < quantification (threshold) cycle (Cq) <= Cq Limit of Detection (LOD)2018-04-23
BELow surrogate recovery; analyzed twice2011-12-01
BFRESample influenced by fire2021-04-05
BHReporting limits raised due to high level of non-target analytes2017-05-25
BITRInsufficient taxonomic resolution to calculate CSCI2021-04-05
BLMCompound unidentified or below the RL due to overdilution2010-03-17
BLNOLow number of organisms, may impact CSCI calculation2021-04-05
BNTXSample did not contain organisms for taxonomic identification needed to conduct calculations2021-12-31
BQCTaxonomy External Quality Control2017-04-19
BRKSample not analyzed, sample container broken2020-10-30
BRKASample container broken but analyzed2010-03-17
BSInsufficient sample available to follow standard QC procedures2010-03-17
BSALSample influenced by saline conditions2021-04-05
BSCRSample influenced by scour or suspected scour event2021-12-31
BTInsufficient sample to perform the analysis2010-03-17
BUCMUntested or unknown benthic macroinvertebrate collection method2021-04-05
BUTPSampling conducted during unrepresentative time period for CSCI calculation2021-04-05
BVSample received after holding time expired2010-03-17
BWIMPortion of upstream tributary watershed for benthic macroinvertebrates is in Mexico2021-04-05
BXSample stored at improper temperature2010-03-17
BYSample received at improper temperature2010-03-17
BZSample preserved improperly2010-03-17
BZ15Sample not filtered within 15 minutes2014-07-16
CPesticide result confirmed using GC/MS- EPA Flag2010-06-11
CESample not homogeneous2010-06-03
CFAConversion factor applied to value to maintain comparability with historic dataset measured using a different digest/extract or analytical method2024-09-10
CINValue outside confidence interval2012-03-11
CJAnalyte concentration is in excess of the instrument calibration; considered estimated2011-12-01
CKInitial analysis within holding time but failed QA/QC criteria2020-01-14
CNHydrocarbon response in diesel range but does not resemble diesel2019-05-29
CNCCalibration nonconformances2019-05-29
CNMDRO (C10-C28) resembles weathered diesel2018-07-05
CNPcalibration not performed2013-01-09
CQAConcentration not reported for QA sample only % Recovery or RPD reported2010-03-17
CSQC criteria not met due to analyte concentration near RL2010-03-17
CSGBacteria result calculated using a subset of grids when the filter is too concentrated2015-01-20
CTQC criteria not met due to high level of analyte concentration2010-03-17
CVHCONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION HIGH, NO BIAS2015-07-20
CVHBCONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION HIGH, HIGH BIAS2015-07-20
CVLCONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION LOW, NO BIAS2015-07-20
CVLBCONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION LOW, LOW BIAS2015-07-20
CZMproject sample was heterogeneous and sample homogeneity could not be readily achieved using routine laboratory practices, therefore RPD was outside the specified acceptance limits2015-03-10
DEPA Flag - Analytes analyzed at a secondary dilution2010-03-17
DBQA results outside of acceptance limits due to matrix effects2010-03-17
DBLODDetected Below Limit of Detection used for PCR analysis only2017-04-18
DBMQC results outside of acceptance limits, associated sample result not affected since analyte was not detected or below the reporting limit.2016-10-25
DFReporting limits elevated due to matrix interferences2010-03-17
DGreporting limits elevated due to sample dilution2011-05-12
DOCoelution2010-03-17
DRLSpike concentration is less than RL2024-08-05
DRMSpike amount less than 5X the MDL2010-03-17
DSBatch Quality Assurance data from another project2010-03-17
DTMethod detection limit elevated2016-05-17
DVReporting limit elevated due to final volume of the sample extract was higher than the nominal amount2020-09-08
EEPA Flag - Analyte exceeded the concentration range of the GC/MS2020-01-10
EDTAEDTA added to Selenastrum capricornutum toxicity test2019-07-17
ERVExceeds reference control limits2012-04-20
EUMLCS is outside of control limits2011-08-03
EXMatrix spike diluted to not detectable during analysis2016-09-13
FSample mistakenly filtered2010-03-17
FCLField calibration not performed within 24 hours before use2010-03-17
FDCDrift check not acceptable2010-03-17
FDIField instrument displaced but still deployed in water2014-09-23
FDOField instrument displaced and removed from water2014-09-23
FDPField duplicate RPD above QC limit2010-03-17
FDPMField duplicate RPD above QC limit with results >=5 xRL2019-08-22
FDRDry Channel2010-03-17
FDSDry Site2011-09-01
FEUEquipment Unavailable2010-03-17
FIAnalyte in field sample and associated blank2018-07-27
FIALocation was inaccessible to obtain a measurement2010-03-17
FIBField instrument buried2014-09-23
FIFInstrument/Probe Failure2010-03-17
FINRField data collected while probe is not recording analyte or calibrating2024-02-01
FIOField instrument above water level2014-09-23
FIPField instrument vandalized, fouled, or otherwise in poor condition2014-09-23
FITInvalid time. ?Likely instrument error or failure2014-02-04
FIVInvalid velocity. ?Likely instrument error or failure2014-02-04
FLVVelocity too low to be measured2010-03-17
FNMno documentation of the field measurement collection exists2010-03-17
FOEstimated maximum possible concentration (EMPC)2013-07-08
FSToo Shallow for probe measurement2010-03-17
FTDLocation was too deep to obtain a measurement2010-03-17
FTTWater too turbid to measure2013-01-02
FUDUnable to deploy instrument2010-03-17
FXAnalyte present in the instrument blank2010-03-17
GBMatrix spike recovery not within control limits2010-03-17
GBCCRM analyte recovery not within control limits2010-03-17
GBM Matrix spike recovery is out of QC limit, but matrix spike duplicate recovery is acceptable2020-10-13
GCSecond column confirmation performed2010-03-17
GCASecond column confirmation absent (not reported)2015-01-02
GDsecondary column result2010-03-17
GIDAIsotope Dilution Analogue recovery not within control limits2022-02-18
GNSurrogate recovery is outside of control limits2010-03-17
GRInternal standard recovery is outside method recovery limit2010-03-17
HA holding time violation has occurred.2010-03-17
H22Sample exceeds incubation period of 18-22 hours.2010-11-22
H24Holding time was > 24 hours for Bacteria tests only2010-03-17
H8Holding time was > 8 hrs but < 24 hours for Bacteria tests only2013-01-17
HBResult positively biased2015-03-26
HDChromat. profile inconsistent with pattern(s) of ref. fuel stnds.2016-12-23
HHResult exceeds linear range; concentration may be understated2011-12-01
HLAnalyte recovery above established limit2019-05-14
HMAnalyte recovery below established limit2019-05-14
HNO2Holding time violation occurred on the NO2 concentration used for NO3 calculation.2010-04-13
HRPost-digestion spike2010-03-17
HSSpike analyte recovery is outside stated control limits2008-01-01
HSMSampling crew or submitting agency field spike recovery not within control limits2019-10-09
HTAnalytical value calculated using results from associated tests2010-03-17
HXSpike recovery out of limits, but QC batch considered in control2019-05-14
IDAIsotope Dilution Analogue corrected2022-02-18
IESurrogate not added to this sample2010-03-17
IFSample result is greater than reported value2010-03-17
ILRPD exceeds laboratory control limit2010-03-17
ILMRSD exceeds control limit2013-03-19
ILNRlog exceeds control limit2014-02-11
ILORlog not calculated because concentration below RL2015-08-18
IMMethod does not include this analyte as part of compound list2010-03-17
IPAnalyte detected in field or lab generated blank2012-06-18
IP10Analyte detected in field or lab generated blank, >RL and >1/10 amount detected in associated environmental sample2019-06-03
IP5Analyte detected in field or lab generated blank, >RL and >1/5 amount detected in associated environmental sample2012-06-21
IPFAnalyte detected in field blank, data validation code2020-03-18
IPMDL2Analyte detected in field or lab generated blank, >10% lowest detection in batch and >2.2x MDL2012-06-21
IPMDL3Analyte detected in field or lab generated blank, >MDL and >30% lowest detection in batch2012-06-21
IPNDResult not distinguishable from lab blank contamination, data validation code2020-03-18
IPRLAnalyte detected in field or lab generated blank, >RL2012-06-21
ISReporting limit elevated due to pres. of analyte in method blank2010-03-17
IUPercent Recovery exceeds laboratory control limit2008-01-01
IZMBottle integrity compromised, potential contamination2012-10-17
JEstimated value - EPA Flag2010-03-17
JAAnalyte positively identified but quantitation is an estimate2010-03-17
JDLEstimated result lower than detection limit2016-04-14
KSurrogate or Isotope Dilution Analogue (IDA) Corrected Value, peak detected, but did not meet quantification criteria, value represents estimated maximum concentration2023-12-19
LAConfirmatory analysis was past holding time2020-01-14
LBResult negatively biased2016-06-07
LCLaboratory Contamination2010-03-17
LRGNData rejected - Surrogate recovery not within control limits, flagged by laboratory2012-04-23
LRILData rejected - RPD exceeds laboratory control limit, flagged by laboratory2012-08-13
LRIPData rejected - Analyte detected in field or lab generated blank, flagged by laboratory2012-06-18
LRIUData rejected - Percent Recovery exceeds laboratory control limit, flagged by laboratory2011-08-22
LRJData rejected - Estimated value - EPA Flag, flagged by laboratory2011-08-22
LRJAData rejected - Analyte positively identified but quantitation is an estimate, flagged by laboratory2012-09-20
LRMData rejected - A matrix effect is present, flagged by laboratory2011-08-22
LRQData rejected - Based on professional judgement QA/QC protocols were not met, flagged by lab2011-08-22
LSTSample was lost or destroyed2010-03-17
MA matrix effect is present2010-03-17
MALMale Adult1900-01-01
MBMMethod (lab generated) blank missing from batch2023-09-27
MBPMethod (lab generated) blank did not go through entire preparation and analytical process2023-09-27
MNMethod procedures not followed2010-03-17
MOINo associated % moisture results and therefore should not be compared to dry weight thresholds2023-03-16
NTentatively Identified Compound2010-03-17
NASNot adjusted for salinity2016-12-15
NBCValue not blank corrected2008-08-11
NCAnalyte concentration not certifiable in Certified Reference Material2010-03-17
NGThe reported result is a negative value2012-02-16
NMDLNo Method Detection Limit reported from laboratory2010-03-17
NoneNone - No QA Qualifier2010-03-17
NRNot Recorded2010-03-17
NRLNo Reporting Limit reported by the laboratory2010-04-07
NTRNot Total Recovery: Method typically provides <50% recovery of analyte in native samples despite good recovery in spiked samples.2012-11-07
OAAnalyte over range when run undiluted. Diluted result below PQL2011-04-06
OLResult may be biased high due to carry over from prior analysis2019-03-13
OVResult is averaged2010-03-17
PEvidence analyte present2010-03-17
PEHSample was preserved to extend the holding time2020-01-07
PGCalibration verification outside control limits2010-03-17
PGNSurrogate recovery is within the lab or method defined acceptance criteria, but is outside of project-specific control limits2022-01-14
PIPrimary and confirmation results varied by > than 40%2010-03-17
PILRPD is within the lab or method defined acceptance criteria, but is outside of project-specific control limits2022-03-10
PJResult from re-extract/re-anal to confirm original MS/MSD result2010-03-17
PJMResult from re-extract/re-anal to confirm original result2010-03-17
PJNResult from re-extract/re-analysis for QC purposes only2010-03-17
PMQOData met laboratory MQO, but did not meet project MQO2024-05-03
PPDilutions for BOD failed criteria of 2 mg/L diss. O2 depletion2011-05-12
PRMLow survival in toxicity test resulted from test interference due to pathogen-related mortality2012-12-12
PUMLCS recovery is within the lab or method defined acceptance criteria, but is outside of project-specific control limits2022-01-14
QQuestionable result2010-03-17
QAXWhen the native sample for the MS/MSD or DUP is not included in the batch reported2010-03-17
QGIndividual analyte exceedances allowed per NELAC2013-11-07
RData rejected - EPA Flag2010-03-17
REElevated reporting limits due to limited sample volume2010-03-17
RELReporting limits elevated above QAPP targets due to change in identified lab capabilities over course of project implementation.2015-06-04
RIPRIP;see individual QADescr for complete definition1900-01-01
RIURIU;see individual QADescr for complete definition1900-01-01
RJRJ;see individual QADescr for complete definition1900-01-01
RLSTReplicate lost or destroyed2016-08-01
RMDLData rejected - Spike concentration is less than MDL2024-08-16
ROQQuantification (threshold) cycle (Cq) > Cq Lower Limit of Quantification (LLOQ), positive result2018-03-20
RPVSample failed to meet representativeness requirements1900-01-01
RQSpike recovery not calculated due to high concentration of analyte2014-07-22
RQMSpike recovery not calculated due to matrix interference2019-05-14
RULCS rec. within marginal exceedances, 3-4 s.d. around the mean.2017-05-25
RUMAcceptable QC with marginal exceedance2020-01-29
RYStandard Instrument related QC exceeds the control limits2016-09-19
RYMReporting Limit check standard failed laboratory defined acceptance criteria. Data is accepted based on passing method required QC2018-10-31
SSample Receipt nonconformance2017-10-13
SCSurrogate Corrected Value2010-03-17
SCRScreening level analysis2010-03-17
SLMAnalyte results for R1 and/or R2 were lower than 10 times the MDL, therefore RPD acceptance limits do not apply2014-06-04
SNSee narrative and/or special notes2020-02-20
SSMSecond source recovery below method control limit2020-02-12
TAAmmonia precision or accuracy exceeds laboratory control limit2010-03-17
TABTest organisms do not meet the minimum age limit at test initiation2021-10-12
TACAlternative control used in toxicity statistical analysis2013-10-31
TADAdditional metamorphosized or pupated organism accidently included in statistical analysis2022-02-18
TAETest organisms exceed age limit at test initiation2018-02-15
TAFTest organisms exceed the maximum weight requirement at test initiation2022-04-06
TAMToxicity test organism age at test start is not recorded2021-07-22
TASAlternate species tested 2024-02-02
TCConductivity precision or accuracy exceeds laboratory control limit2010-03-17
TCFAlternative control does not meet test acceptability criteria2018-02-15
TCIConductivity insufficient for test species2010-03-17
TCTConductivity tolerance exceeded for test species2010-03-17
TDDO precision or accuracy exceeds laboratory control limit2010-03-17
TEMEndpoint not analyzed or reported by the laboratory2023-01-19
THHardness precision or accuracy exceeds laboratory control limit2010-03-17
THSHydrogen sulfide precision or accuracy exceeds laboratory control limit2010-03-17
TKAlkalinity precision or accuracy exceeds laboratory control limit2012-06-05
TLMinor deviation in temperature or light (comment)2010-03-17
TMMMale replicate excluded from test analysis2022-03-15
TMOTest organisms escaped or are otherwise missing2019-10-07
TMSDEndpoint considered not toxic; per EPA method, when both the relative difference from control and the test percent minimum significant difference (PMSD) are less than EPA lower PMSD bound (10th percentile)2023-08-18
TNCToo numerous to count2013-03-19
TNSOnly neonate counts from surviving adults were used in the analysis2010-03-17
TOQNumber of organisms in a toxicity test do not meet the minimum quantity per replicate at test initiation or an unequal quantity of organisms per replicate is used2015-07-10
TPpH precision or accuracy exceeds laboratory control limit2010-03-17
TRTest conditions not acceptable (temp, light)2010-03-17
TRTReference toxicant test failed due to control survival less than 80%2019-12-28
TSSalinity precision or accuracy exceeds laboratory control limit2010-03-17
TWWater quality parameters outside recommended test method ranges2010-03-17
TWNRequired water quality parameters not measured2017-12-08
TXPToxaphene results are based on a commercial Toxaphene mixture of unknown composition and therefore the concentrations listed in this report are estimated2019-06-11
UFCounts outside acceptable range.2016-11-18
UJAnalyte was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit.Reported quantitation limit is approx. & may not represent the actual limit of quantitation necessary to accurately and precisely measure the analyte in the sample.2010-03-17
UKMLock mass interference present2012-10-01
ULMAnalyte detected in associated bottle blank check2014-05-21
UOLResult determined to be an outlier at the time of data validation2015-08-13
UPMField duplicate exceeds QC limit with results < 5 x RL. Absolute difference is > RL2019-08-22
UTSample value was blank corrected2020-08-10
VBBSample > 4x spike concentration, flagged by QAO2013-09-13
VBLMCompound unidentified or below the RL due to overdilution, flagged by QAO1900-01-01
VBSInsufficient sample available to follow standard QC procedures, flagged by QAO2011-08-22
VBTInsufficient sample to perform the analysis, flagged by QAO2022-08-18
VBYSample received at improper temperature, flagged by QAO2010-03-17
VBZSample preserved improperly, flagged by QAO2010-05-26
VBZ15Sample not filtered within 15 minutes, flagged by QAO2015-02-26
VCResult was calculated by DMT when not provided for DNQ ResQualCode, value 1/2 distance between MDL and RL, flagged by QAO2010-03-17
VCINValue outside confidence interval, flagged by QAO2022-03-14
VCJAnalyte concentration is in excess of the instrument calibration; considered estimated, flagged by QAO2013-09-08
VCOSample analyte concentration detectable but <5X blank concentration (contamination), flagged by QAO2011-08-29
VCQanalyte concentration >10X blank concentration2011-05-12
VCRSample analyte concentration >5X blank concentration (True hit), flagged by QAO2011-08-29
VCSQC criteria not met due to analyte concentration near RL, flagged by QAO2019-03-13
VDEPA Flag - Analytes analyzed at a secondary dilution, flagged by QAO2012-03-22
VDGReporting limits elevated due to sample dilution, flagged by QAO2019-03-13
VDOCoelution; flagged by QAO2012-11-14
VDRLSpike concentration is less than RL, flagged by QAO2024-08-05
VDSBatch Quality Assurance data from another project, flagged by QAO2010-06-28
VEDTAEDTA added to Selenastrum capricornutum toxicity test, flagged by QAO2019-07-30
VELBLab batch sample quantity exceedes number of samples allowed per batch, flagged by QAO2015-08-17
VEUMLCS/LCM recovery not within control limits, flagged by QAO2010-03-17
VFCLField calibration not performed within 24 hours before use, flagged by QAO2022-02-02
VFDPField duplicate RPD above QC limit;flagged by QAO2010-03-17
VFIFInstrument/Probe Failure, flagged by QAO2014-01-09
VFIRLInvalid RL, suspected laboratory transcription error, flagged by QAO2020-01-15
VFNMNo documentation of the field measurement collection exists, flagged by QAO2016-07-21
VFOEstimated maximum possible concentration (EPMC), flagged by QAO2013-09-20
VGBMatrix spike recovery not within control limits, flagged by QAO2010-03-17
VGBCCRM recovery not within control limits, flagged by QAO2010-03-17
VGIDAIsotope Dilution Analogue recovery not within control limits, Flagged by QAO2023-06-27
VGNSurrogate recovery not within control limits, flagged by QAO2010-03-17
VHHolding time violation occurred, flagged by QAO2010-03-17
VH24Holding time was > 24 hours for Bacteria tests only, flagged by QAO2010-08-13
VH8Holding time was > 8 hrs but < 24 hours for Bacteria tests only, flagged by QAO2013-01-17
VHBResult positively biased, flagged by QAO2013-09-03
VHSSpike analyte recovery is outside stated control limits, flagged by QAO2019-03-13
VIESurrogate not added to this sample, flagged by QAO2014-06-06
VILRPD exceeds control limit, flagged by QAO2010-03-17
VILNRlog exceeds control limit, flagged by QAO2015-08-18
VILORlog not calculated because concentration below RL, flagged by QAO2015-08-18
VIPAnalyte detected in field or lab generated blank, flagged by QAO2012-06-18
VIP5Analyte detected in field or lab generated blank, >RL and >1/5 amount detected in associated environmental sample, flagged by QAO2012-06-21
VIPFAnalyte detected in field blank, data validation code, flagged by QAO2010-03-18
VIPMDL2Analyte detected in field or lab generated blank, >10% lowest detection in batch and >2.2x MDL, flagged by QAO2012-06-21
VIPMDL3Analyte detected in field or lab generated blank, >MDL and >30% lowest detection in batch, flagged by QAO2012-06-21
VIPNDResult not distinguishable from lab blank contamination, data validation code, flagged by QAO2020-03-18
VIPRLAnalyte detected in field or lab generated blank, >RL, flagged by QAO2012-06-21
VISReporting limit elevated due to pres. of analyte in method blank, flagged by QAO2011-08-22
VIUPercent Recovery exceeds laboratory control limit, flagged by QAO2010-03-17
VJEstimated value - EPA Flag, flagged by QAO2011-08-22
VJAAnalyte positively identified but quantitation is an estimate, flagged by QAO2011-08-22
VLBResult negatively biased, flagged by QAO2013-05-15
VLMQOData did not meet laboratory MQO, but met project MQO, flagged by QAO2017-01-09
VMA matrix effect is present, flagged by QAO2011-08-22
VMBMMethod (lab generated) blank missing from batch, flagged by QAO2023-10-04
VMBPMethod (lab generated) blank did not go through entire preparation and analytical process, flagged by QAO2023-10-04
VMNMethod procedures not followed, flagged by QAO1900-01-01
VMOINo associated % moisture results and therefore should not be compared to dry weight thresholds, flagged by QAO2023-03-29
VNBCValue not blank corrected, flagged by QAO2011-08-22
VNCAnalyte concentration not certifiable in Certified Reference Material, flagged by QAO2010-03-17
VNMDLNo Method Detection Limit reported from laboratory, flagged by QAO2012-04-18
VNTRNot Total Recovery: Method typically provides <50% recovery of analyte in native samples despite good recovery in spiked samples, flagged by QAO.2012-11-07
VOLResult may be biased high due to carry over from prior analysis, flagged by QAO2019-03-13
VPJMResult from re-extract/re-anal to confirm original result, flagged by QAO2012-05-31
VPMQOData met laboratory MQO, but did not meet project MQO, flagged by QAO2016-09-14
VQQuestionable Result, flagged by QAO2021-12-16
VQAXWhen the native sample for the MS/MSD or DUP is not included in the batch reported, flagged by QAO2010-03-17
VQCAQA/QC protocols were not met for accuracy, flagged by QAO2012-06-04
VQCPQA/QC protocols were not met for precision, flagged by QAO2012-06-04
VQNNo QA/QC performed or performed but not reported, used with historical data, Batch comment required2012-03-07
VRData rejected - EPA Flag, flagged by QAO2009-04-29
VRBSData rejected - Insufficient sample available to follow standard QC procedures, flagged by QAO2011-08-22
VRBZData rejected - Sample preserved improperly, flagged by QAO2011-08-22
VRDOData rejected - Co-elution, flagged by QAO2011-08-22
VREElevated reporting limits due to limited sample volume, flagged by QAO2011-06-08
VRELReporting limits elevated due to change in lab capabilities, flagged by QAO2015-06-04
VRGNData rejected - Surrogate recovery not within control limits, flagged by QAO2009-08-18
VRILData rejected - RPD exceeds control limit, flagged by QAO2011-09-14
VRIPData rejected - Analyte detected in field or lab generated blank, flagged by QAO2012-06-18
VRIUData rejected - Percent Recovery exceeds laboratory control limit, flagged by QAO2011-09-14
VRJData rejected - Estimated value - EPA Flag, flagged by QAO2011-08-22
VRLBData rejected - Result negatively biased, flagged by QAO2013-12-18
VRLSTReplicate lost or destroyed, flagged by QAO2016-08-01
VRMDLData rejected - Spike concentration is less than MDL, flagged by QAO2024-08-16
VRQSpike recovery not calculated due to high concentration of analyte, flagged by QAO1900-01-01
VRVQData rejected - Based on professional judgement QA/QC protocols were not met, flagged by QAO2011-08-22
VSSample Receipt nonconformance, flagged by QAO2010-10-28
VSCSurrogate Corrected Value, flagged by QAO2011-05-26
VSCRScreening level analysis, flagged by QAO2010-03-17
VSD3Result greater than three standard deviations from historical average, flagged by QAO2013-09-03
VTABTest organisms do not meet the minimum age limit at test initiation, flagged by QAO2021-10-12
VTACAlternative control used in toxicity statistical analysis, flagged by QAO2015-08-11
VTAETest organisms exceed age limit at test initiation, flagged by QAO2018-02-15
VTAMToxicity test organism age at test start is not recorded, flagged by QAO2021-07-22
VTCFAlternative control does not meet test acceptability criteria, flagged by QAO2018-02-02
VTCIConductivity insufficient for test species, flagged by QAO2010-03-17
VTCTConductivity tolerance exceeded for test species, flagged by QAO2010-03-17
VTLMinor deviation in temperature or light, flagged by QAO2020-12-07
VTMOTest organisms escaped or are otherwise missing, flagged by QAO2019-10-07
VTNCToo numerous to count, flagged by QAO2013-04-05
VTOQNumber of organisms in a toxicity test do not meet the minimum quantity per replicate at test initiation or an unequal quantity of organisms per replicate is used, flagged by QAO2015-08-10
VTRTest conditions not acceptable (temp, light), flagged by QAO2015-08-13
VTWWater quality parameters outside recommended test method ranges, flagged by QAO2010-04-27
VTWNRequired water quality parameters not measured, flagged by QAO2017-12-08
VUKMLock mass interference present, flagged by QAO2024-09-25
VVQBased on professional judgement QA/QC protocols were not met, flagged by QAO2011-08-22
WESample filtered immediately upon receipt by the laboratory.2017-12-15
XIHydrocarbon response in motor oil range but does not resemble motor oil2019-05-29